| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829 |
- # In this project, we use CODEOWNERS to identify people who are likely to know
- # who should review a pull request.
- #
- # People listed in this file are committing to respond in a timely fashion to
- # PRs in the selected areas. However, that response doesn't have to be a full
- # code review; it could also take any of these forms:
- #
- # - "I intend to review this but I can't yet. Please leave me a message if I
- # haven't responded by (a specific date in the near future)."
- #
- # - "I think (a specific other contributor) should review this." (Note that the
- # best reviewer for a PR may not necessarily be listed in this file.)
- #
- # People must only be added to this file if they've agreed to provide one of
- # the above responses in a reasonable amount of time for every PR to which
- # they're assigned.
- #
- # We only ask for this commitment from people who are employed full-time to
- # work on this project. We gratefully welcome reviews from other contributors,
- # but we don't believe it's fair to ask volunteers to respond quickly.
- # If none of the later patterns match, assign to anyone. This team is the
- # parent of all the other teams and automatically includes everyone on those
- # teams.
- * @loganek @lum1n0us @no1wudi @wenyongh @xujuntwt95329 @yamt
- # Some parts of the project require more specialized knowledge. In those areas
- # we designate smaller groups who are more likely to be aware of who's working
- # in specific areas.
|
